Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Duty drawback recovery under Rule 16, despite no express limitation period, must be initiated within a reasonable time based on the facts. The text states that delayed recovery may be sustainable where fraudulent availment or suppression is alleged, but non-production of proof of export-proceeds realisation alone does not establish either ground. Where recovery proceedings begin more than seven years after drawback payments and no explanation is given for the delay, the text treats the proceedings as time-barred. It also notes that the consequential demand and penalty were set aside.
Duty drawback recovery under Rule 16, despite no express limitation period, must be initiated within a reasonable time based on the facts. The text states that delayed recovery may be sustainable where fraudulent availment or suppression is alleged, but non-production of proof of export-proceeds realisation alone does not establish either ground. Where recovery proceedings begin more than seven years after drawback payments and no explanation is given for the delay, the text treats the proceedings as time-barred. It also notes that the consequential demand and penalty were set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.