Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Liquid crystal display touch-panel modules specifically covered by tariff heading 9013 cannot be classified under heading 8537 as programmable switchboards or controllers merely because of their use in a final product. Applying the Supreme Court's ruling in CCC, Aurangabad v. Videocon Industries, the article notes that the specific LCD heading governs unless the goods are more specifically provided for elsewhere. The classification order was set aside, and the matter was remitted for a fresh classification decision under Chapter 90.
Liquid crystal display touch-panel modules specifically covered by tariff heading 9013 cannot be classified under heading 8537 as programmable switchboards or controllers merely because of their use in a final product. Applying the Supreme Court's ruling in CCC, Aurangabad v. Videocon Industries, the article notes that the specific LCD heading governs unless the goods are more specifically provided for elsewhere. The classification order was set aside, and the matter was remitted for a fresh classification decision under Chapter 90.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.