Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
461 to 480 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Territorial jurisdiction for a money-laundering offence may lie with any Special Court covering a local area where proceeds of crime are derived, obtained, concealed, possessed, acquired, used or projected as untainted property. The notes state that acquisition of alleged proceeds and attachment of related land at Gurugram made institution there competent, while concealment of proceeds attached at Delhi also created concurrent jurisdiction. Where the connected scheduled offence had been transferred to Delhi, transferring the PMLA proceeding there was considered expedient so that both matters could be tried by a Special Court having jurisdiction over the laundering offence. The proceeding was to continue at its existing stage.
Territorial jurisdiction for a money-laundering offence may lie with any Special Court covering a local area where proceeds of crime are derived, obtained, concealed, possessed, acquired, used or projected as untainted property. The notes state that acquisition of alleged proceeds and attachment of related land at Gurugram made institution there competent, while concealment of proceeds attached at Delhi also created concurrent jurisdiction. Where the connected scheduled offence had been transferred to Delhi, transferring the PMLA proceeding there was considered expedient so that both matters could be tried by a Special Court having jurisdiction over the laundering offence. The proceeding was to continue at its existing stage.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
