Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Specified regulatory authority income receives conditional tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return f...
Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-filing...
Input tax credit conditions remain constitutionally valid, with eligible recipient claims considered under GST circulars and retrospective filing dead...
Specialised qualifications for agricultural-land valuers are justified by the technical factors required in valuation, including land classification, crops, soil quality, fertility, irrigation, cultivation and comparable sales. Rule 8A(3) validly requires a degree in Agricultural Science and relevant farm-valuation experience, while treating specified former Government officers with prescribed service experience as a distinct eligible class based on their land-administration and valuation experience. The rule is not arbitrary or discriminatory merely because persons with other qualifications, including Civil Engineering, claim competence. The constitutional challenge under Articles 14 and 19 failed, and rejection of registration for lack of the prescribed qualification remained undisturbed.
Specialised qualifications for agricultural-land valuers are justified by the technical factors required in valuation, including land classification, crops, soil quality, fertility, irrigation, cultivation and comparable sales. Rule 8A(3) validly requires a degree in Agricultural Science and relevant farm-valuation experience, while treating specified former Government officers with prescribed service experience as a distinct eligible class based on their land-administration and valuation experience. The rule is not arbitrary or discriminatory merely because persons with other qualifications, including Civil Engineering, claim competence. The constitutional challenge under Articles 14 and 19 failed, and rejection of registration for lack of the prescribed qualification remained undisturbed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.