Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3221 to 3240 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Retrospective relaxation of the time limit for claiming input tax credit under section 16(5) can remove the section 16(4) impediment where returns for the relevant period were filed by 30 November 2021; accordingly, the delayed-availment demand for 2018-19 was quashed. Alleged GST short payment and excess credit arising from supplier-return mismatches require factual reconsideration, including verification of claimed voluntary payment and asserted insolvency proceedings involving the service provider. Consequential enhanced penalty depends on the surviving demand and therefore could not be sustained while the remaining issues required fresh adjudication.
Retrospective relaxation of the time limit for claiming input tax credit under section 16(5) can remove the section 16(4) impediment where returns for the relevant period were filed by 30 November 2021; accordingly, the delayed-availment demand for 2018-19 was quashed. Alleged GST short payment and excess credit arising from supplier-return mismatches require factual reconsideration, including verification of claimed voluntary payment and asserted insolvency proceedings involving the service provider. Consequential enhanced penalty depends on the surviving demand and therefore could not be sustained while the remaining issues required fresh adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.