Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Electronic dispatch through the ITBA portal determines the issuance date of a reassessment notice where transmission occurs after the statutory transition to the substituted reassessment procedure. A notice dated and digitally signed before 1 April 2021 but triggered and delivered electronically on that date is treated as issued on 1 April 2021, because the Department controlled the transmission delay. Such a notice cannot proceed directly under the earlier reassessment process; it must be treated as a show-cause notice under Section 148A(b), accompanied by the relied-upon information and material, with an opportunity to object before an order under Section 148A(d). Completed reassessment proceedings and consequential notices are therefore liable to be quashed, subject to fresh proceedings and statutory defences.
Electronic dispatch through the ITBA portal determines the issuance date of a reassessment notice where transmission occurs after the statutory transition to the substituted reassessment procedure. A notice dated and digitally signed before 1 April 2021 but triggered and delivered electronically on that date is treated as issued on 1 April 2021, because the Department controlled the transmission delay. Such a notice cannot proceed directly under the earlier reassessment process; it must be treated as a show-cause notice under Section 148A(b), accompanied by the relied-upon information and material, with an opportunity to object before an order under Section 148A(d). Completed reassessment proceedings and consequential notices are therefore liable to be quashed, subject to fresh proceedings and statutory defences.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.