Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Revision under section 263 requires the assessment order to be both erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. The distinction between lack of inquiry and inadequate inquiry is material: where the Assessing Officer has examined relevant expenses, related-party payments, GST-exempt services, financial records, returns, GST details, TDS particulars and supplier-level material, revision cannot be based merely on a view that further verification was desirable. The revisional authority must identify an actual error from the assessment record and demonstrate resulting prejudice; it cannot order a fresh investigation without establishing both statutory conditions. The stated result was quashing of the revisionary order and allowance of the assessee's appeal.
Revision under section 263 requires the assessment order to be both erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. The distinction between lack of inquiry and inadequate inquiry is material: where the Assessing Officer has examined relevant expenses, related-party payments, GST-exempt services, financial records, returns, GST details, TDS particulars and supplier-level material, revision cannot be based merely on a view that further verification was desirable. The revisional authority must identify an actual error from the assessment record and demonstrate resulting prejudice; it cannot order a fresh investigation without establishing both statutory conditions. The stated result was quashing of the revisionary order and allowance of the assessee's appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
