Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Revision under section 263 requires the assessment order to be both erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. The distinction between lack of inquiry and inadequate inquiry is material: where the Assessing Officer has examined relevant expenses, related-party payments, GST-exempt services, financial records, returns, GST details, TDS particulars and supplier-level material, revision cannot be based merely on a view that further verification was desirable. The revisional authority must identify an actual error from the assessment record and demonstrate resulting prejudice; it cannot order a fresh investigation without establishing both statutory conditions. The stated result was quashing of the revisionary order and allowance of the assessee's appeal.
Revision under section 263 requires the assessment order to be both erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. The distinction between lack of inquiry and inadequate inquiry is material: where the Assessing Officer has examined relevant expenses, related-party payments, GST-exempt services, financial records, returns, GST details, TDS particulars and supplier-level material, revision cannot be based merely on a view that further verification was desirable. The revisional authority must identify an actual error from the assessment record and demonstrate resulting prejudice; it cannot order a fresh investigation without establishing both statutory conditions. The stated result was quashing of the revisionary order and allowance of the assessee's appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.