Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Revision under section 263 requires the assessment order to be both erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. The distinction between lack of inquiry and inadequate inquiry is material: where the Assessing Officer has examined relevant expenses, related-party payments, GST-exempt services, financial records, returns, GST details, TDS particulars and supplier-level material, revision cannot be based merely on a view that further verification was desirable. The revisional authority must identify an actual error from the assessment record and demonstrate resulting prejudice; it cannot order a fresh investigation without establishing both statutory conditions. The stated result was quashing of the revisionary order and allowance of the assessee's appeal.
Revision under section 263 requires the assessment order to be both erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. The distinction between lack of inquiry and inadequate inquiry is material: where the Assessing Officer has examined relevant expenses, related-party payments, GST-exempt services, financial records, returns, GST details, TDS particulars and supplier-level material, revision cannot be based merely on a view that further verification was desirable. The revisional authority must identify an actual error from the assessment record and demonstrate resulting prejudice; it cannot order a fresh investigation without establishing both statutory conditions. The stated result was quashing of the revisionary order and allowance of the assessee's appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
