Pre-existing operational debt disputes require genuine evidence, while undirected running-account payments may be appropriated on a first-in-first-out...
Agency in CNG distribution makes outlet operators commission agents, rendering taxable Business Auxiliary Service rather than purchasing goods for res...
Composite inpatient healthcare supply may retain exemption despite MRP medicine billing, while separate taxable sale characterisation remains disputed...
Working-capital adjustment determines whether software-services transfer-pricing margins fall within the statutory tolerance range, eliminating any ad...
Permanent establishment deductions upheld for expatriate salaries, direct costs and trading losses, while head-office costs require fresh classificati...
Page of 4782
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
601 to 620 of 95636 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty under section 271D requires the Assessing Officer to record jurisdictional satisfaction during assessment proceedings; without that satisfaction, the Joint Commissioner cannot independently initiate penalty proceedings after dropping proceedings under section 271DA, rendering the penalty without jurisdiction. The notes also explain that penalties under sections 271D and 271E remain subject to the prescribed limitation period. Where the limitation period expired before fresh proceedings were initiated, the subsequent penalty proceedings were time-barred. Accordingly, the penalties described in the source were deleted on the independent grounds of absent jurisdictional satisfaction and limitation.
Penalty under section 271D requires the Assessing Officer to record jurisdictional satisfaction during assessment proceedings; without that satisfaction, the Joint Commissioner cannot independently initiate penalty proceedings after dropping proceedings under section 271DA, rendering the penalty without jurisdiction. The notes also explain that penalties under sections 271D and 271E remain subject to the prescribed limitation period. Where the limitation period expired before fresh proceedings were initiated, the subsequent penalty proceedings were time-barred. Accordingly, the penalties described in the source were deleted on the independent grounds of absent jurisdictional satisfaction and limitation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.