Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Me...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, an...
Integrated golf function determines classification, placing launch monitors and simulators under other golf equipment rather than measuring instrument...
Transfer pricing adjustments on intra-group technical support...
Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examination
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Transfer pricing adjustments on intra-group technical support services were rejected where services were demonstrated, CUP benchmarking was not displaced, and the payments were not shareholder activities. Royalty paid under the technical collaboration arrangement remained revenue expenditure under the consistency principle, while straight-line operating lease rent based on AS-19 and depreciation on a river-bank embankment previously included in the block of assets were allowed. Employees' contribution disallowance was remanded to determine the applicable provision in light of Checkmate India and prevent double addition. A warranty provision was also remanded because its scientific basis, warranty period and utilisation were not adequately supported by reliable evidence. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.
Transfer pricing adjustments on intra-group technical support services were rejected where services were demonstrated, CUP benchmarking was not displaced, and the payments were not shareholder activities. Royalty paid under the technical collaboration arrangement remained revenue expenditure under the consistency principle, while straight-line operating lease rent based on AS-19 and depreciation on a river-bank embankment previously included in the block of assets were allowed. Employees' contribution disallowance was remanded to determine the applicable provision in light of Checkmate India and prevent double addition. A warranty provision was also remanded because its scientific basis, warranty period and utilisation were not adequately supported by reliable evidence. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.