Bona fide disclosure requirements govern under-reporting penalties, and post-penalty immunity applications cannot secure available statutory protectio...
Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Transfer pricing adjustments on intra-group technical support...
Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examination
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Transfer pricing adjustments on intra-group technical support services were rejected where services were demonstrated, CUP benchmarking was not displaced, and the payments were not shareholder activities. Royalty paid under the technical collaboration arrangement remained revenue expenditure under the consistency principle, while straight-line operating lease rent based on AS-19 and depreciation on a river-bank embankment previously included in the block of assets were allowed. Employees' contribution disallowance was remanded to determine the applicable provision in light of Checkmate India and prevent double addition. A warranty provision was also remanded because its scientific basis, warranty period and utilisation were not adequately supported by reliable evidence. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.
Transfer pricing adjustments on intra-group technical support services were rejected where services were demonstrated, CUP benchmarking was not displaced, and the payments were not shareholder activities. Royalty paid under the technical collaboration arrangement remained revenue expenditure under the consistency principle, while straight-line operating lease rent based on AS-19 and depreciation on a river-bank embankment previously included in the block of assets were allowed. Employees' contribution disallowance was remanded to determine the applicable provision in light of Checkmate India and prevent double addition. A warranty provision was also remanded because its scientific basis, warranty period and utilisation were not adequately supported by reliable evidence. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
