Section 80P deduction covers Souharda credit societies, including qualifying surplus-deposit interest, subject to member KYC verification for cash dep...
Transfer-pricing benchmarking and capital-receipt principles sustained taxpayer relief, while unsupported property-advance write-offs remained disallo...
Pre-existing operational debt disputes require genuine evidence, while undirected running-account payments may be appropriated on a first-in-first-out...
Agency in CNG distribution makes outlet operators commission agents, rendering taxable Business Auxiliary Service rather than purchasing goods for res...
Transfer pricing adjustments on intra-group technical support...
Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examination
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Transfer pricing adjustments on intra-group technical support services were rejected where services were demonstrated, CUP benchmarking was not displaced, and the payments were not shareholder activities. Royalty paid under the technical collaboration arrangement remained revenue expenditure under the consistency principle, while straight-line operating lease rent based on AS-19 and depreciation on a river-bank embankment previously included in the block of assets were allowed. Employees' contribution disallowance was remanded to determine the applicable provision in light of Checkmate India and prevent double addition. A warranty provision was also remanded because its scientific basis, warranty period and utilisation were not adequately supported by reliable evidence. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.
Transfer pricing adjustments on intra-group technical support services were rejected where services were demonstrated, CUP benchmarking was not displaced, and the payments were not shareholder activities. Royalty paid under the technical collaboration arrangement remained revenue expenditure under the consistency principle, while straight-line operating lease rent based on AS-19 and depreciation on a river-bank embankment previously included in the block of assets were allowed. Employees' contribution disallowance was remanded to determine the applicable provision in light of Checkmate India and prevent double addition. A warranty provision was also remanded because its scientific basis, warranty period and utilisation were not adequately supported by reliable evidence. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
