Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Page of 4788
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
421 to 440 of 95749 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Transfer pricing adjustments on intra-group technical support...
Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examination
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Transfer pricing adjustments on intra-group technical support services were rejected where services were demonstrated, CUP benchmarking was not displaced, and the payments were not shareholder activities. Royalty paid under the technical collaboration arrangement remained revenue expenditure under the consistency principle, while straight-line operating lease rent based on AS-19 and depreciation on a river-bank embankment previously included in the block of assets were allowed. Employees' contribution disallowance was remanded to determine the applicable provision in light of Checkmate India and prevent double addition. A warranty provision was also remanded because its scientific basis, warranty period and utilisation were not adequately supported by reliable evidence. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.
Transfer pricing adjustments on intra-group technical support services were rejected where services were demonstrated, CUP benchmarking was not displaced, and the payments were not shareholder activities. Royalty paid under the technical collaboration arrangement remained revenue expenditure under the consistency principle, while straight-line operating lease rent based on AS-19 and depreciation on a river-bank embankment previously included in the block of assets were allowed. Employees' contribution disallowance was remanded to determine the applicable provision in light of Checkmate India and prevent double addition. A warranty provision was also remanded because its scientific basis, warranty period and utilisation were not adequately supported by reliable evidence. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.