Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Transfer pricing adjustments on intra-group technical support...
Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examination
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Transfer pricing adjustments on intra-group technical support services were rejected where services were demonstrated, CUP benchmarking was not displaced, and the payments were not shareholder activities. Royalty paid under the technical collaboration arrangement remained revenue expenditure under the consistency principle, while straight-line operating lease rent based on AS-19 and depreciation on a river-bank embankment previously included in the block of assets were allowed. Employees' contribution disallowance was remanded to determine the applicable provision in light of Checkmate India and prevent double addition. A warranty provision was also remanded because its scientific basis, warranty period and utilisation were not adequately supported by reliable evidence. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.
Transfer pricing adjustments on intra-group technical support services were rejected where services were demonstrated, CUP benchmarking was not displaced, and the payments were not shareholder activities. Royalty paid under the technical collaboration arrangement remained revenue expenditure under the consistency principle, while straight-line operating lease rent based on AS-19 and depreciation on a river-bank embankment previously included in the block of assets were allowed. Employees' contribution disallowance was remanded to determine the applicable provision in light of Checkmate India and prevent double addition. A warranty provision was also remanded because its scientific basis, warranty period and utilisation were not adequately supported by reliable evidence. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
