Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
A later registration of a conveyance deed does not create a separate capital-gains charge where the underlying land was already included in a slump sale of the entire business undertaking and the resulting gain was taxed under section 50B in an earlier assessment year. The Bhiwandi land formed part of the assets transferred for lump-sum consideration, and the later deed was treated as formalising title rather than effecting an independent transfer. Accordingly, isolating that land and taxing the same transfer again in a subsequent year would result in double taxation, and the later long-term capital-gain addition was deleted. A decision concerning an individual immovable-property transfer was distinguished as factually different from a slump sale of an undertaking.
A later registration of a conveyance deed does not create a separate capital-gains charge where the underlying land was already included in a slump sale of the entire business undertaking and the resulting gain was taxed under section 50B in an earlier assessment year. The Bhiwandi land formed part of the assets transferred for lump-sum consideration, and the later deed was treated as formalising title rather than effecting an independent transfer. Accordingly, isolating that land and taxing the same transfer again in a subsequent year would result in double taxation, and the later long-term capital-gain addition was deleted. A decision concerning an individual immovable-property transfer was distinguished as factually different from a slump sale of an undertaking.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.