Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
461 to 480 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A writ petition may be entertained against a show-cause notice where the challenge concerns jurisdiction and discloses a prima facie case, despite pending statutory proceedings. The authority is not prevented from considering and deciding the notice; however, the affected parties must participate in the proceedings, while enforcement of any resulting decision may be restrained pending disposal of the writ petition or further orders. The court does not determine the merits of the underlying jurisdictional objection at this stage, including the scope of the relevant notification or the authority to issue the notice under Section 73. The arrangement preserves participation in adjudication while providing interim protection against enforcement.
A writ petition may be entertained against a show-cause notice where the challenge concerns jurisdiction and discloses a prima facie case, despite pending statutory proceedings. The authority is not prevented from considering and deciding the notice; however, the affected parties must participate in the proceedings, while enforcement of any resulting decision may be restrained pending disposal of the writ petition or further orders. The court does not determine the merits of the underlying jurisdictional objection at this stage, including the scope of the relevant notification or the authority to issue the notice under Section 73. The arrangement preserves participation in adjudication while providing interim protection against enforcement.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
