Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Objections to reassessment must address material submissions relevant to the alleged source of funds for share purchases. Although the Assessing Officer's reasoning appeared prima facie sustainable on the material initially available, later material comprising a letter and annexures concerning loans and own funds also required consideration before the objections were decided. The order rejecting the objections was therefore set aside, with directions for fresh consideration after examining the additional material. The validity of the reopening was not decided, and all contentions on its merits remained open.
Objections to reassessment must address material submissions relevant to the alleged source of funds for share purchases. Although the Assessing Officer's reasoning appeared prima facie sustainable on the material initially available, later material comprising a letter and annexures concerning loans and own funds also required consideration before the objections were decided. The order rejecting the objections was therefore set aside, with directions for fresh consideration after examining the additional material. The validity of the reopening was not decided, and all contentions on its merits remained open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.