Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Objections to reassessment must address material submissions relevant to the alleged source of funds for share purchases. Although the Assessing Officer's reasoning appeared prima facie sustainable on the material initially available, later material comprising a letter and annexures concerning loans and own funds also required consideration before the objections were decided. The order rejecting the objections was therefore set aside, with directions for fresh consideration after examining the additional material. The validity of the reopening was not decided, and all contentions on its merits remained open.
Objections to reassessment must address material submissions relevant to the alleged source of funds for share purchases. Although the Assessing Officer's reasoning appeared prima facie sustainable on the material initially available, later material comprising a letter and annexures concerning loans and own funds also required consideration before the objections were decided. The order rejecting the objections was therefore set aside, with directions for fresh consideration after examining the additional material. The validity of the reopening was not decided, and all contentions on its merits remained open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.