Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Full and true disclosure under Section 245C(1) must extend to the entire settlement application, including the manner in which undisclosed income was derived and supporting particulars. A voluntary disclosure does not remove this statutory requirement; failure to substantiate a disputed income component can invalidate the settlement application as a whole, rather than permit piecemeal consideration. The notes further state that the Settlement Commission must examine the application as filed and cannot recharacterise income disclosed as business income under Section 69B or apply Section 115BBE. Any alternative assessment and consequential tax treatment must arise in regular assessment proceedings before the Assessing Officer.
Full and true disclosure under Section 245C(1) must extend to the entire settlement application, including the manner in which undisclosed income was derived and supporting particulars. A voluntary disclosure does not remove this statutory requirement; failure to substantiate a disputed income component can invalidate the settlement application as a whole, rather than permit piecemeal consideration. The notes further state that the Settlement Commission must examine the application as filed and cannot recharacterise income disclosed as business income under Section 69B or apply Section 115BBE. Any alternative assessment and consequential tax treatment must arise in regular assessment proceedings before the Assessing Officer.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
