Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
A development agreement does not necessarily constitute a...
Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration defer taxation.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
A development agreement does not necessarily constitute a transfer of immovable property under sections 2(47)(v) or 2(47)(vi) where possession is merely permissive, legal rights remain with the landowner, construction is incomplete, and consideration is not received during the relevant year. Applying the section 53A part-performance standard and the real income principle, the Tribunal's reasoning was that no legal possession, enjoyment, or income had accrued to the assessee in AY 2012-13. Accordingly, no transfer of the capital asset occurred and capital gains were not chargeable for that year. The capital gains addition was deleted, while the section 54F deduction claim was treated as academic.
A development agreement does not necessarily constitute a transfer of immovable property under sections 2(47)(v) or 2(47)(vi) where possession is merely permissive, legal rights remain with the landowner, construction is incomplete, and consideration is not received during the relevant year. Applying the section 53A part-performance standard and the real income principle, the Tribunal's reasoning was that no legal possession, enjoyment, or income had accrued to the assessee in AY 2012-13. Accordingly, no transfer of the capital asset occurred and capital gains were not chargeable for that year. The capital gains addition was deleted, while the section 54F deduction claim was treated as academic.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
