Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
461 to 480 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A development agreement does not necessarily constitute a...
Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration defer taxation.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
A development agreement does not necessarily constitute a transfer of immovable property under sections 2(47)(v) or 2(47)(vi) where possession is merely permissive, legal rights remain with the landowner, construction is incomplete, and consideration is not received during the relevant year. Applying the section 53A part-performance standard and the real income principle, the Tribunal's reasoning was that no legal possession, enjoyment, or income had accrued to the assessee in AY 2012-13. Accordingly, no transfer of the capital asset occurred and capital gains were not chargeable for that year. The capital gains addition was deleted, while the section 54F deduction claim was treated as academic.
A development agreement does not necessarily constitute a transfer of immovable property under sections 2(47)(v) or 2(47)(vi) where possession is merely permissive, legal rights remain with the landowner, construction is incomplete, and consideration is not received during the relevant year. Applying the section 53A part-performance standard and the real income principle, the Tribunal's reasoning was that no legal possession, enjoyment, or income had accrued to the assessee in AY 2012-13. Accordingly, no transfer of the capital asset occurred and capital gains were not chargeable for that year. The capital gains addition was deleted, while the section 54F deduction claim was treated as academic.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
