Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
An institution conducting hospital, medical college, education and research activities for persons irrespective of religion, caste or creed should not be treated as purely religious merely because its governing documents contain an isolated reference to churchyards or burial grounds. The described Tribunal decision found no factual evidence of religious activities and held that selective reliance on one object clause, without examining financial statements or actual activities, was insufficient. It directed that the section 12AB registration be classified as religious-cum-charitable and that approval under section 80G(5) be granted, noting that the institution's medical and educational facilities were open to all sections of society and that there was no change in relevant facts.
An institution conducting hospital, medical college, education and research activities for persons irrespective of religion, caste or creed should not be treated as purely religious merely because its governing documents contain an isolated reference to churchyards or burial grounds. The described Tribunal decision found no factual evidence of religious activities and held that selective reliance on one object clause, without examining financial statements or actual activities, was insufficient. It directed that the section 12AB registration be classified as religious-cum-charitable and that approval under section 80G(5) be granted, noting that the institution's medical and educational facilities were open to all sections of society and that there was no change in relevant facts.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.