Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Transfer pricing comparables for software development services...
Turnover filters and receivables benchmarking reshape software-services transfer pricing: high-turnover comparables excluded and interest recomputed at LIBOR plus 2%
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Transfer pricing comparables for software development services should exclude companies with substantially higher turnover where their inclusion would distort the margins of a smaller captive service provider. Applying the accepted turnover range of Rs. 1 crore to Rs. 200 crores, the Tribunal directed exclusion of companies exceeding the upper limit and recomputation of the arm's length price. Foreign-currency receivables from associated-enterprise transactions were treated as international transactions for transfer pricing purposes. However, the interest adjustment was not accepted at the rate previously applied; it was directed to be recomputed using LIBOR plus 2%. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.
Transfer pricing comparables for software development services should exclude companies with substantially higher turnover where their inclusion would distort the margins of a smaller captive service provider. Applying the accepted turnover range of Rs. 1 crore to Rs. 200 crores, the Tribunal directed exclusion of companies exceeding the upper limit and recomputation of the arm's length price. Foreign-currency receivables from associated-enterprise transactions were treated as international transactions for transfer pricing purposes. However, the interest adjustment was not accepted at the rate previously applied; it was directed to be recomputed using LIBOR plus 2%. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.