Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
21 to 40 of 95872 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Transfer pricing comparables for software development services...
Turnover filters and receivables benchmarking reshape software-services transfer pricing: high-turnover comparables excluded and interest recomputed at LIBOR plus 2%
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Transfer pricing comparables for software development services should exclude companies with substantially higher turnover where their inclusion would distort the margins of a smaller captive service provider. Applying the accepted turnover range of Rs. 1 crore to Rs. 200 crores, the Tribunal directed exclusion of companies exceeding the upper limit and recomputation of the arm's length price. Foreign-currency receivables from associated-enterprise transactions were treated as international transactions for transfer pricing purposes. However, the interest adjustment was not accepted at the rate previously applied; it was directed to be recomputed using LIBOR plus 2%. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.
Transfer pricing comparables for software development services should exclude companies with substantially higher turnover where their inclusion would distort the margins of a smaller captive service provider. Applying the accepted turnover range of Rs. 1 crore to Rs. 200 crores, the Tribunal directed exclusion of companies exceeding the upper limit and recomputation of the arm's length price. Foreign-currency receivables from associated-enterprise transactions were treated as international transactions for transfer pricing purposes. However, the interest adjustment was not accepted at the rate previously applied; it was directed to be recomputed using LIBOR plus 2%. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.