Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1 to 20 of 95872 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Transfer pricing comparables for software development services...
Turnover filters and receivables benchmarking reshape software-services transfer pricing: high-turnover comparables excluded and interest recomputed at LIBOR plus 2%
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Transfer pricing comparables for software development services should exclude companies with substantially higher turnover where their inclusion would distort the margins of a smaller captive service provider. Applying the accepted turnover range of Rs. 1 crore to Rs. 200 crores, the Tribunal directed exclusion of companies exceeding the upper limit and recomputation of the arm's length price. Foreign-currency receivables from associated-enterprise transactions were treated as international transactions for transfer pricing purposes. However, the interest adjustment was not accepted at the rate previously applied; it was directed to be recomputed using LIBOR plus 2%. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.
Transfer pricing comparables for software development services should exclude companies with substantially higher turnover where their inclusion would distort the margins of a smaller captive service provider. Applying the accepted turnover range of Rs. 1 crore to Rs. 200 crores, the Tribunal directed exclusion of companies exceeding the upper limit and recomputation of the arm's length price. Foreign-currency receivables from associated-enterprise transactions were treated as international transactions for transfer pricing purposes. However, the interest adjustment was not accepted at the rate previously applied; it was directed to be recomputed using LIBOR plus 2%. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.