Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Page of 4789
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
441 to 460 of 95769 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Under the combined transaction approach to TNMM, separate benchmarking of royalty and Global Accounts Manager charges is impermissible where those costs are already included in the operating costs of the logistics segment being benchmarked. The transfer pricing adjustments for those items were therefore deleted, consistent with the principle that individual cost elements embedded in an accepted combined segment analysis should not be separately benchmarked without a corresponding cost-base adjustment. Claims concerning TDS credit and errors in computing interest and fees were treated as computational matters requiring verification and were remitted to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration after providing an opportunity of hearing. The appeal was consequently partly allowed.
Under the combined transaction approach to TNMM, separate benchmarking of royalty and Global Accounts Manager charges is impermissible where those costs are already included in the operating costs of the logistics segment being benchmarked. The transfer pricing adjustments for those items were therefore deleted, consistent with the principle that individual cost elements embedded in an accepted combined segment analysis should not be separately benchmarked without a corresponding cost-base adjustment. Claims concerning TDS credit and errors in computing interest and fees were treated as computational matters requiring verification and were remitted to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration after providing an opportunity of hearing. The appeal was consequently partly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.