Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
461 to 480 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Writ petition seeking mandamus to compel tax and enforcement authorities to act on complaints about an alleged cash transaction was treated by the HC as premature. The Court noted that the petitioner had already unsuccessfully challenged a cheque-dishonour conviction up to the SC and was effectively trying to obtain a different finding on the underlying transaction. The asserted risk of proceedings under section 271D was held to be only an apprehension, unsupported by material, so no mandamus was issued. The petitioner's representation was left open for consideration in accordance with law.
Writ petition seeking mandamus to compel tax and enforcement authorities to act on complaints about an alleged cash transaction was treated by the HC as premature. The Court noted that the petitioner had already unsuccessfully challenged a cheque-dishonour conviction up to the SC and was effectively trying to obtain a different finding on the underlying transaction. The asserted risk of proceedings under section 271D was held to be only an apprehension, unsupported by material, so no mandamus was issued. The petitioner's representation was left open for consideration in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.