Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Writ petition seeking mandamus to compel tax and enforcement authorities to act on complaints about an alleged cash transaction was treated by the HC as premature. The Court noted that the petitioner had already unsuccessfully challenged a cheque-dishonour conviction up to the SC and was effectively trying to obtain a different finding on the underlying transaction. The asserted risk of proceedings under section 271D was held to be only an apprehension, unsupported by material, so no mandamus was issued. The petitioner's representation was left open for consideration in accordance with law.
Writ petition seeking mandamus to compel tax and enforcement authorities to act on complaints about an alleged cash transaction was treated by the HC as premature. The Court noted that the petitioner had already unsuccessfully challenged a cheque-dishonour conviction up to the SC and was effectively trying to obtain a different finding on the underlying transaction. The asserted risk of proceedings under section 271D was held to be only an apprehension, unsupported by material, so no mandamus was issued. The petitioner's representation was left open for consideration in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4790
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
