Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2701 to 2720 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Under the substituted reassessment regime effective from 1 April 2021, issuance of a notice under section 148 and an order under section 148A(d) required prior approval from the specified authority in section 151. Where more than three years had elapsed from the end of the relevant assessment year, approval had to come from the higher authority identified in section 151(ii); approval by a Principal Commissioner was insufficient. The proviso allowing exclusion of time spent under section 148A(b), inserted by the Finance Act 2023, was treated as prospective. On that basis, the reopening was held invalid.
Under the substituted reassessment regime effective from 1 April 2021, issuance of a notice under section 148 and an order under section 148A(d) required prior approval from the specified authority in section 151. Where more than three years had elapsed from the end of the relevant assessment year, approval had to come from the higher authority identified in section 151(ii); approval by a Principal Commissioner was insufficient. The proviso allowing exclusion of time spent under section 148A(b), inserted by the Finance Act 2023, was treated as prospective. On that basis, the reopening was held invalid.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
