Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Reassessment proceedings under section 147 are confined to bringing escaped or under-assessed income to tax and cannot be used by an assessee to reopen a concluded matter or withdraw income voluntarily offered in the original return. Where the income had been disclosed under section 139(1), a return filed in response to section 148 could not be used to reduce assessed house property income or obtain review of the original position. The addition was sustained, the merits of the ownership-based explanation were left open as academic, and the appellate order was upheld.
Reassessment proceedings under section 147 are confined to bringing escaped or under-assessed income to tax and cannot be used by an assessee to reopen a concluded matter or withdraw income voluntarily offered in the original return. Where the income had been disclosed under section 139(1), a return filed in response to section 148 could not be used to reduce assessed house property income or obtain review of the original position. The addition was sustained, the merits of the ownership-based explanation were left open as academic, and the appellate order was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
