Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Reassessment proceedings under section 147 are confined to bringing escaped or under-assessed income to tax and cannot be used by an assessee to reopen a concluded matter or withdraw income voluntarily offered in the original return. Where the income had been disclosed under section 139(1), a return filed in response to section 148 could not be used to reduce assessed house property income or obtain review of the original position. The addition was sustained, the merits of the ownership-based explanation were left open as academic, and the appellate order was upheld.
Reassessment proceedings under section 147 are confined to bringing escaped or under-assessed income to tax and cannot be used by an assessee to reopen a concluded matter or withdraw income voluntarily offered in the original return. Where the income had been disclosed under section 139(1), a return filed in response to section 148 could not be used to reduce assessed house property income or obtain review of the original position. The addition was sustained, the merits of the ownership-based explanation were left open as academic, and the appellate order was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.