Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reassessment proceedings under section 147 are confined to bringing escaped or under-assessed income to tax and cannot be used by an assessee to reopen a concluded matter or withdraw income voluntarily offered in the original return. Where the income had been disclosed under section 139(1), a return filed in response to section 148 could not be used to reduce assessed house property income or obtain review of the original position. The addition was sustained, the merits of the ownership-based explanation were left open as academic, and the appellate order was upheld.
Reassessment proceedings under section 147 are confined to bringing escaped or under-assessed income to tax and cannot be used by an assessee to reopen a concluded matter or withdraw income voluntarily offered in the original return. Where the income had been disclosed under section 139(1), a return filed in response to section 148 could not be used to reduce assessed house property income or obtain review of the original position. The addition was sustained, the merits of the ownership-based explanation were left open as academic, and the appellate order was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.