Bogus donation receipts justified commission income assessment and defeated political-party tax exemption for inaccurate accounts and reporting failur...
Pure reimbursement without income element escapes tax withholding, while delayed withholding and unsupported provisions face deferred or renewed scrut...
Public benefit requirement defeats charitable registration where residents' association services are reciprocal, member-only facilities governed by mu...
Exempt-income expenditure disallowance is confined to investments that actually generated exempt income, while supported business expenses remain dedu...
Objective characteristics and principal use govern mining-tyre classification, while fresh advance ruling applications may rely on additional technica...
Page of 4788
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
461 to 480 of 95752 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Revenue-neutral specified domestic transfer pricing for...
Revenue-neutral domestic transfer pricing and mirror transactions justified deletion of related-party adjustments for operation, maintenance and port services.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Revenue-neutral specified domestic transfer pricing for operation and maintenance services did not justify an adjustment where both related entities were taxable in India and eligible for the same deduction, with no demonstrated base erosion or diversion outside the tax net; the deletion of that adjustment was upheld. For sale of port services, the corresponding mirror transaction had already been accepted as at arm's length in the counter-party's hands, so the deletion of that adjustment was also upheld.
Revenue-neutral specified domestic transfer pricing for operation and maintenance services did not justify an adjustment where both related entities were taxable in India and eligible for the same deduction, with no demonstrated base erosion or diversion outside the tax net; the deletion of that adjustment was upheld. For sale of port services, the corresponding mirror transaction had already been accepted as at arm's length in the counter-party's hands, so the deletion of that adjustment was also upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.