Omitted specified domestic transaction provision invalidates related-party expenditure transfer-pricing references and assessments based on consequent...
Preventive suspension requires an immediate continuing threat and cannot become indefinite without inquiry, fresh evidence, or proportionate safeguard...
Post-export amendment of shipping bills to change the scheme code from drawback to RoSCTL was treated as permissible under Section 149, because the three-month limit in Circular No. 36/2010 was not supported by valid law. The text notes that time limits for such amendments could be prescribed only through regulations under Section 157, and that later 2025 regulations reinforced that position. On that basis, the adjudicating authority's decision allowing the amendment was upheld and the Revenue's challenge was rejected.
Post-export amendment of shipping bills to change the scheme code from drawback to RoSCTL was treated as permissible under Section 149, because the three-month limit in Circular No. 36/2010 was not supported by valid law. The text notes that time limits for such amendments could be prescribed only through regulations under Section 157, and that later 2025 regulations reinforced that position. On that basis, the adjudicating authority's decision allowing the amendment was upheld and the Revenue's challenge was rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
