Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Post-export amendment of shipping bills to change the scheme code from drawback to RoSCTL was treated as permissible under Section 149, because the three-month limit in Circular No. 36/2010 was not supported by valid law. The text notes that time limits for such amendments could be prescribed only through regulations under Section 157, and that later 2025 regulations reinforced that position. On that basis, the adjudicating authority's decision allowing the amendment was upheld and the Revenue's challenge was rejected.
Post-export amendment of shipping bills to change the scheme code from drawback to RoSCTL was treated as permissible under Section 149, because the three-month limit in Circular No. 36/2010 was not supported by valid law. The text notes that time limits for such amendments could be prescribed only through regulations under Section 157, and that later 2025 regulations reinforced that position. On that basis, the adjudicating authority's decision allowing the amendment was upheld and the Revenue's challenge was rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
