Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Post-export amendment of shipping bills to change the scheme code from drawback to RoSCTL was treated as permissible under Section 149, because the three-month limit in Circular No. 36/2010 was not supported by valid law. The text notes that time limits for such amendments could be prescribed only through regulations under Section 157, and that later 2025 regulations reinforced that position. On that basis, the adjudicating authority's decision allowing the amendment was upheld and the Revenue's challenge was rejected.
Post-export amendment of shipping bills to change the scheme code from drawback to RoSCTL was treated as permissible under Section 149, because the three-month limit in Circular No. 36/2010 was not supported by valid law. The text notes that time limits for such amendments could be prescribed only through regulations under Section 157, and that later 2025 regulations reinforced that position. On that basis, the adjudicating authority's decision allowing the amendment was upheld and the Revenue's challenge was rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
