Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Me...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, an...
Integrated golf function determines classification, placing launch monitors and simulators under other golf equipment rather than measuring instrument...
Section 96 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code creates an interim moratorium from the filing of an application under Sections 94 or 95 until admission, staying pending debt proceedings and barring fresh legal action on the debt during that period. A money recovery suit filed while that embargo operated was therefore barred by law and liable to rejection under Order VII Rule 11(d). The later insertion of Section 96(4) did not cure an earlier filing, and lack of knowledge of the insolvency proceedings was immaterial because the bar operated by statute. The plaint could not be split against some defendants on a joint and several liability theory once the statutory prohibition applied.
Section 96 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code creates an interim moratorium from the filing of an application under Sections 94 or 95 until admission, staying pending debt proceedings and barring fresh legal action on the debt during that period. A money recovery suit filed while that embargo operated was therefore barred by law and liable to rejection under Order VII Rule 11(d). The later insertion of Section 96(4) did not cure an earlier filing, and lack of knowledge of the insolvency proceedings was immaterial because the bar operated by statute. The plaint could not be split against some defendants on a joint and several liability theory once the statutory prohibition applied.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
