Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3301 to 3320 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
At the attachment stage under PMLA, the Tribunal applied preponderance of probabilities and held that bank trail material, statements of the persons concerned, the cash book and RTGS/NEFT records were sufficient to show receipt of proceeds of crime by the appellant; minor discrepancies in the cash figures did not destroy the evidentiary value, and final culpability was left to the pending prosecution complaint. It also held that property acquired before the crime period remained liable to equivalent value attachment where direct proceeds were no longer available, since no bar flows from the definition of proceeds of crime. Attachment was treated as a protective measure, and the appeal was dismissed.
At the attachment stage under PMLA, the Tribunal applied preponderance of probabilities and held that bank trail material, statements of the persons concerned, the cash book and RTGS/NEFT records were sufficient to show receipt of proceeds of crime by the appellant; minor discrepancies in the cash figures did not destroy the evidentiary value, and final culpability was left to the pending prosecution complaint. It also held that property acquired before the crime period remained liable to equivalent value attachment where direct proceeds were no longer available, since no bar flows from the definition of proceeds of crime. Attachment was treated as a protective measure, and the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4813 
Join Channel 
