Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Registered security interest under SARFAESI was treated as giving the secured creditor priority over State tax dues, and the State could not displace that priority by relying on a first-charge claim under MVAT. For pre-Central-law cases, a mere attachment order was insufficient; the State had to show compliance with the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code recovery procedure, including due proclamation, which was not demonstrated here. The State also had not registered its charge with CERSAI, and the amendment-based challenge to section 37 of MVAT was rejected. The attachment and encumbrance were quashed, and the sale certificate was to be registered free of encumbrance.
Registered security interest under SARFAESI was treated as giving the secured creditor priority over State tax dues, and the State could not displace that priority by relying on a first-charge claim under MVAT. For pre-Central-law cases, a mere attachment order was insufficient; the State had to show compliance with the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code recovery procedure, including due proclamation, which was not demonstrated here. The State also had not registered its charge with CERSAI, and the amendment-based challenge to section 37 of MVAT was rejected. The attachment and encumbrance were quashed, and the sale certificate was to be registered free of encumbrance.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.