Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Limitation for penalty proceedings under the second limb of the penalty-limitation provision applied where no assessment proceedings had been initiated for the relevant years. On the stated facts, the penalty notice was issued independently on the basis of a statement recorded in another person's scrutiny proceedings, so the first limb, tied to completion of proceedings in which penalty action was initiated, did not apply. The limitation therefore ran for six months from the end of the month in which penalty action was initiated. The Tribunal treated the penalty orders as time-barred and quashed them, leaving the other grounds open as academic.
Limitation for penalty proceedings under the second limb of the penalty-limitation provision applied where no assessment proceedings had been initiated for the relevant years. On the stated facts, the penalty notice was issued independently on the basis of a statement recorded in another person's scrutiny proceedings, so the first limb, tied to completion of proceedings in which penalty action was initiated, did not apply. The limitation therefore ran for six months from the end of the month in which penalty action was initiated. The Tribunal treated the penalty orders as time-barred and quashed them, leaving the other grounds open as academic.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.