Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3221 to 3240 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Delayed recovery of associated enterprise receivables was held not to justify a working capital transfer pricing adjustment where the branch was debt-free, had no borrowings or interest claim, and its working capital needs were funded by head office, so no opportunity cost or borrowed-funds assumption was shown. The Tribunal therefore found no basis to interfere with deletion of the adjustment. Interest under section 234D was treated as consequential, and that ground was accepted on the assessee's concession.
Delayed recovery of associated enterprise receivables was held not to justify a working capital transfer pricing adjustment where the branch was debt-free, had no borrowings or interest claim, and its working capital needs were funded by head office, so no opportunity cost or borrowed-funds assumption was shown. The Tribunal therefore found no basis to interfere with deletion of the adjustment. Interest under section 234D was treated as consequential, and that ground was accepted on the assessee's concession.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.