Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
An AO must pass the final assessment order in conformity with the DRP's directions under section 144C(13); any departure, even if said to be due to mistake or misunderstanding, is impermissible. Applying binding High Court precedent, the Tribunal quashed the non-compliant final assessment order because the AO repeated the draft order and ignored the relief granted by the DRP. The transfer pricing and consequential grounds were left open as academic.
An AO must pass the final assessment order in conformity with the DRP's directions under section 144C(13); any departure, even if said to be due to mistake or misunderstanding, is impermissible. Applying binding High Court precedent, the Tribunal quashed the non-compliant final assessment order because the AO repeated the draft order and ignored the relief granted by the DRP. The transfer pricing and consequential grounds were left open as academic.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
