Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
An AO must pass the final assessment order in conformity with the DRP's directions under section 144C(13); any departure, even if said to be due to mistake or misunderstanding, is impermissible. Applying binding High Court precedent, the Tribunal quashed the non-compliant final assessment order because the AO repeated the draft order and ignored the relief granted by the DRP. The transfer pricing and consequential grounds were left open as academic.
An AO must pass the final assessment order in conformity with the DRP's directions under section 144C(13); any departure, even if said to be due to mistake or misunderstanding, is impermissible. Applying binding High Court precedent, the Tribunal quashed the non-compliant final assessment order because the AO repeated the draft order and ignored the relief granted by the DRP. The transfer pricing and consequential grounds were left open as academic.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
