Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
An AO must pass the final assessment order in conformity with the DRP's directions under section 144C(13); any departure, even if said to be due to mistake or misunderstanding, is impermissible. Applying binding High Court precedent, the Tribunal quashed the non-compliant final assessment order because the AO repeated the draft order and ignored the relief granted by the DRP. The transfer pricing and consequential grounds were left open as academic.
An AO must pass the final assessment order in conformity with the DRP's directions under section 144C(13); any departure, even if said to be due to mistake or misunderstanding, is impermissible. Applying binding High Court precedent, the Tribunal quashed the non-compliant final assessment order because the AO repeated the draft order and ignored the relief granted by the DRP. The transfer pricing and consequential grounds were left open as academic.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
