Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
RTGS credits received from entities linked to an individual were treated as benami funds routed from demonetised cash, because the transfers followed demonetisation, the appellant had no prior business relationship with those entities, and the oath statement recorded under Section 131 was found admissible and relevant. The appellant's bills, ledger entries, purchase documents and stock records were not accepted as independent proof of genuine bullion sales, while the bank records corroborated receipt from unknown firms. On natural justice, the Tribunal held that no cross-examination issue arose for a person whose statement was not on record, and that no actual prejudice was shown from the failed opportunity to cross-examine the witness. The provisional attachment was sustained and the appeal dismissed.
RTGS credits received from entities linked to an individual were treated as benami funds routed from demonetised cash, because the transfers followed demonetisation, the appellant had no prior business relationship with those entities, and the oath statement recorded under Section 131 was found admissible and relevant. The appellant's bills, ledger entries, purchase documents and stock records were not accepted as independent proof of genuine bullion sales, while the bank records corroborated receipt from unknown firms. On natural justice, the Tribunal held that no cross-examination issue arose for a person whose statement was not on record, and that no actual prejudice was shown from the failed opportunity to cross-examine the witness. The provisional attachment was sustained and the appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
