Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Threshold exemption excludes exempt services, while stamp-paper purchases avoid reverse charge; consequential service tax penalties were also set asid...
RTGS credits received from entities linked to an individual were treated as benami funds routed from demonetised cash, because the transfers followed demonetisation, the appellant had no prior business relationship with those entities, and the oath statement recorded under Section 131 was found admissible and relevant. The appellant's bills, ledger entries, purchase documents and stock records were not accepted as independent proof of genuine bullion sales, while the bank records corroborated receipt from unknown firms. On natural justice, the Tribunal held that no cross-examination issue arose for a person whose statement was not on record, and that no actual prejudice was shown from the failed opportunity to cross-examine the witness. The provisional attachment was sustained and the appeal dismissed.
RTGS credits received from entities linked to an individual were treated as benami funds routed from demonetised cash, because the transfers followed demonetisation, the appellant had no prior business relationship with those entities, and the oath statement recorded under Section 131 was found admissible and relevant. The appellant's bills, ledger entries, purchase documents and stock records were not accepted as independent proof of genuine bullion sales, while the bank records corroborated receipt from unknown firms. On natural justice, the Tribunal held that no cross-examination issue arose for a person whose statement was not on record, and that no actual prejudice was shown from the failed opportunity to cross-examine the witness. The provisional attachment was sustained and the appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
