Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
RTGS credits received from entities linked to an individual were treated as benami funds routed from demonetised cash, because the transfers followed demonetisation, the appellant had no prior business relationship with those entities, and the oath statement recorded under Section 131 was found admissible and relevant. The appellant's bills, ledger entries, purchase documents and stock records were not accepted as independent proof of genuine bullion sales, while the bank records corroborated receipt from unknown firms. On natural justice, the Tribunal held that no cross-examination issue arose for a person whose statement was not on record, and that no actual prejudice was shown from the failed opportunity to cross-examine the witness. The provisional attachment was sustained and the appeal dismissed.
RTGS credits received from entities linked to an individual were treated as benami funds routed from demonetised cash, because the transfers followed demonetisation, the appellant had no prior business relationship with those entities, and the oath statement recorded under Section 131 was found admissible and relevant. The appellant's bills, ledger entries, purchase documents and stock records were not accepted as independent proof of genuine bullion sales, while the bank records corroborated receipt from unknown firms. On natural justice, the Tribunal held that no cross-examination issue arose for a person whose statement was not on record, and that no actual prejudice was shown from the failed opportunity to cross-examine the witness. The provisional attachment was sustained and the appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4790
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
