Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Page of 4784
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
821 to 840 of 95673 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Customs penalty was unsustainable where no show cause notice was served on the appellant and he was denied a proper hearing, breaching natural justice. The Tribunal also held that personal penalties on a director could not stand without credible evidence of active role, knowledge, or a specific act or omission attracting Sections 112(a), 112(b) or 114AA. Mere association with the company was insufficient, so the penalty was set aside and the appeal allowed.
Customs penalty was unsustainable where no show cause notice was served on the appellant and he was denied a proper hearing, breaching natural justice. The Tribunal also held that personal penalties on a director could not stand without credible evidence of active role, knowledge, or a specific act or omission attracting Sections 112(a), 112(b) or 114AA. Mere association with the company was insufficient, so the penalty was set aside and the appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.