Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Delayed reporting of foreign direct investment remittances, delayed allotment of shares and non-filing of FC-GPR constituted contraventions under FEMA and the applicable regulations on admitted facts, so the company's breach findings were upheld. A later RBI circular on late submission fees was held inapplicable because it was expressly prospective and the remittances predated it, so that plea failed. Liability of the individual directors was also sustained because the record showed they were responsible for share-allotment and regulatory compliance. The proceedings were treated as civil in nature, absence of mens rea did not bar penalty, but the amounts were reduced on proportionality grounds.
Delayed reporting of foreign direct investment remittances, delayed allotment of shares and non-filing of FC-GPR constituted contraventions under FEMA and the applicable regulations on admitted facts, so the company's breach findings were upheld. A later RBI circular on late submission fees was held inapplicable because it was expressly prospective and the remittances predated it, so that plea failed. Liability of the individual directors was also sustained because the record showed they were responsible for share-allotment and regulatory compliance. The proceedings were treated as civil in nature, absence of mens rea did not bar penalty, but the amounts were reduced on proportionality grounds.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
